Hi, If you can wait about one more day...I'll be posting a link to a ready-to-use polyphonic synthesizer, which uses Frank's [polypoly] object, which in turn uses [poly]. For a sneak peak, see here (the download link doesn't work yet, as I wrap up last-minute issues with the code):
http://www.pkstonemusic.com/polyWaveSynth.html I'll try to have the download in place by tomorrow. But I wanted you to know that polyphony is now very easy and powerful in PD. Phil Stone Atte André Jensen wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > > >> Nice. I will do an exhaustive test later/tomorrow >> > > Thanks! > > >> but I have one >> additional feature idea: [poly] in Pd supports a [clear(-message that >> may be useful for [legato] as well to reset the internal buffers. >> > > That sounds like a plan :-) > > Is the clear-message a special message and what the idea behind it > (pointers to the appropiate place in the doc is fine, don't wast > bandwidth on a newbie)? I looked at poly-help.pd and it makes sense. > Where can I see a simple example with oscillators and all? > > I must admit I'm totally confused about polyphony in pd. Actually I'm > confused to the point where I believed csound to be superiour in exactly > this area [for the non-csounder: csound has dynamic voice allocation > out-of-the-box, meaning it's the default to be able to play as many note > as the cpu can bear, but only active voices are using cpu]. > > Where should I look to learn about polyphony handling in pd? Maybe you > could even give me a quick overview of the broad perspective? > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
