On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:19 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On
>
> It's a bug in the error message, at the very least. This stuff needs
> to be consistent, otherwise it makes it hard to understand and
> debug. If [list( is equal to [bang( then it always needs to be equal
> to [bang(. Right now, it is only sometimes equal to [bang(
>
> Try defining the current behavior, then I think it's more clearly a
> bug. "An empty [list( is a bang unless you are sending to the right
> inlet of some objects, like [select]."
this behaviour kind of reminds me to this thing:
[3 (
|
| [list 3(
|/
[*~]
[3 ( seems to 'work', whereas [list 3( gives an error:
inlet: expected 'signal' but got 'list'
the statement, that it expected 'signal' is false, because it obviously
also accepts floats.
[3 (
|
| [list 3(
|/
[* ]
here both work.
in the former case 'list 3' is treated as a list, in the latter case as
a float. so, is 'list 3' the same as 'float 3' or not?
roman
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
