since it is easy to change, I did not care so much about the structure. I just pasted the basic information. there should be only one "tags" field, but sometimes I got a second or a third. for example pdmtl abstractions had "flags", which I am not exactly sure, what they are for, but I kept them. for the categories, I think I do not want to structure the wiki in categories, because the categories are too vague, but still, chosing from given categories is a good idea, but I also think some objects belong to more than one category. I you have ideas for categories, you are welcome to post. atm this is kraut und rüben (pell-mell). marius.
Georg Holzmann wrote: > Hallo Marius! > > Only some small questions: > for what are the "TAGS","TAGS","TAGS" ? (in your csv file no object uses > them) > > "OBJECTNAME","ABBREVIATION","DESCRIPTION","LIBRARY","CATEGORY","TAGS","TAGS","TAGS","HELP > > PATCH" > > And to the categories: do you want to list objects per category > afterwards, which would meen that we should choose between a fixed set > of categories ? > > > Maybe we could just post more objects here in the list and then you > could add the - although this migth not be optimal ... ;) > > LG > Georg > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
