marius schebella wrote: > we have to talk about structure first. true
> I am against category structure, because category is not always clear. true > I am also against library structure, because that is just an arbitrary > structure for me, worse than categories. well, but what is wrong with an arbitrary structure? pd-development (i am talking about externals) is chaotic and arbitrary: i think this is one of the strengths of the pd-community. > for name clashes make a disambiguation page or directly jump to the so we have a "counter" disambiguation page (let's assume it is called "/counter"); what is the name of the maxlib counter page? "/counter"? "/counter_when_you_have_maxlib"?? what is the name of the markEx counter page? "markex_counter" ?? but there is no "markex_counter" object; what's the difference to "pix_blob" (which _is_ an object)? a directory-structure based on libraries is a defacto standard. do you want to create an information resource or a standardization? > object that is more in use and link to the other one with the same name. right. and i decide. :-) > I am TOTALLY against the word class or selector in any structure > layout!!! totally confusing for 99% of the users. i totally agree. > have a look at http://maxobjects.com. that is basically it. > but pdobjects will have a wiki underlying. how does this relate to the structure? example: [xplay~] (from xsample) pd: http://wiki.puredata.info/xsample/xplay~ max: http://maxobjects.com/?v=objects&id_objet=1010 what is more confusing? the important thing is to have a good search engine! fmga.dr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
