One I get around to it, I'm going to make a release using the current 0.39.3-extended auto-builds. So yeah, I think it's pretty stable.
It's exactly for things like this I worked on Pd-extended, I am glad it's useful. .hc On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Phil Stone wrote: > Hi Hans, > > I'm refactoring the synthesizer I released a couple of weeks ago > (polywavesynth -- no more camels, Frank!), and I very much want to > use > Mr. Peach's OSC object, which are rolled into 0.39.3-ex-rc5. I'm > wondering if it's wise, at this point, to require 0.39.3-ex-rc5 for my > synth? It seems pretty stable -- it's just that it's still in > autobuilds and I don't know if it needs to be frozen before I should > specify it -- keeping in mind that it might be novices downloading and > using this rc5. > > I'm also eagerly following the 0.40 autobuilds (or was, until the > MacIntel machine disappeared :-) ), and look forward to a stable > release > there - but I suppose that's a bit further away, eh? > > Thanks for what you do with PD-extended; there wouldn't be a chance of > an object like polywavesynth being usable by novices without it. > > > Phil Stone > pkstonemusic.com > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
