hard off wrote: > to follow on from a previous thread, > > how does the settable send work in pd 0.40 (i haven't installed it yet) > > if it is just like: > > [set x( > | > [send y] > > then, won't this break backwards compatibility? i often use [send] to > pass set messages on, particularly for example when using [tabread4~]
no, luckily it is not like that (even though people kept requesting it :-)) (that is exactly what i was referring to in my sidekick on "set"-able sends) it is like: ... [symbol newname( | | [send ] that is: if your create a [send] object without(!) a send-name, it will have a second inlet which can be used to set the send-name. whatever(!) you send to the first inlet (including "set bla") will be send to the receiver. so you can seafely upgrade to 0.40 (and you really should do so; it is very nice...) mfg.asdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
