Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I think it would be more useful right now if pd would search in > > subdirectories. For instance there are about 70 directories in > > pd/extra (Pd version 0.40.3-extended-20070905), and only 10 lines in > > the path dialog...not to mention the time wasted typing in every > > single path. At the moment most of the help files are not found and > > the objects don't work unless they are prefixed with their path, > > like [mrpeach/oscsend]. It looks like the function do_open_via_path > > in s_path.c is the one to fix... > > This might break some stuff. For example I often use "private" > subdirectories whose objects should *not* be available globally.
What if pd searched deeply only in the extra directory, then you could put private files elsewhere and they would not be found? The do_open_via_path function already treats 'extra' as a special case, only searching it after all else fails. Martin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
