On Oct 11, 2007, at 12:20 PM, ilya .d wrote:
> i'll have a look at it whenever i have time. > in fact i really enjoy working without scorllbar, as it saves some > space > on the display and looks cool (complitely minimal) In Pd-extended, (on Mac OS X at least), the scrollbars completely disappear if it doesn't need to scroll. > > and easy way of changing pd.tk bihaviour could be sourcing a ~/.pdtkrc > so it sets some basic variables. It seems that should be integrated into one preferences system, with a GUI pref pane and associated storage mechanism. .hc > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:50:21AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: >> >> The key bindings and menus are quite messy in the pd.tk. From >> other Tcl >> apps I've seen, I think it could be made MUCH cleaner and easier >> to handle. >> Basically, there should be one spot for each platform that >> defines all of >> the key bindings and menu structure, then that is used everywhere. >> >> If someone would take this on, I'll gladly help with the tricky bits. >> Another thing that would be really great would be to clean up the >> preferences panels. > > do you mean File->startup and File->path ? or audio settings as well ? >> >> .hc >> >> On Oct 4, 2007, at 1:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Hello list. >>> >>> I'd like to ask those of you who knows Tk/Tcl very well. >>> >>> I have attempted and succeed changing pd.tk for my personal use .. >>> >>> i added extra key biddings and removed menubars .. >>> well, Romain gave me the no-scroll + no-menu script >>> >>> i have few thoughts .. >>> >>> if we could set the menu as function, so it could be removable by >>> a msg >>> ..? >>> >>> may be the window list needs some improvments .. if it could be kept >>> separately from the .m.windows , so removing the whole bock of >>> code with >>> menubar related stuff if pd_menubar==0 could be better then just >>> removing some of bits of it .. >>> >>> regrding fonts, i have set most of them to 'clean', >>> which give a pretty looking gui .. >>> >>> may be they could be set by variables in a separate config file ? >>> >>> >>> i feel like i can most of these modifications myself .. >>> without getting extra complexity like in Mathieu's desiredata .. >>> >>> the question is, how can such kind of enhanchements affect the >>> perfomance ? >>> >>> could some extra variables take extra bits of memory ? >>> how efficient Tk/Tcl is ? ..so people on IRC channel #dataflow >>> complained a lot , that Tk is not very fast etc... >>> >>> setting leyboard biddings i added more the 10 extra conditional >>> statements ..i thoght that getting any keyborad events Tk will >>> have to >>> run trough some more stuff in order to send something to pd, >>> isn't it? >>> or Tk has a way of super-super-fast scan trough all that? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> thanks for attention, >>> ilya .d >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------- >> >> "[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are >> deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from >> scarcity." >> -John Gilmore >> >> > > Companies Act 2006 : http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/companyinfo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
