Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Looks interesting, it would be much easier for us to test it if you > check it into packages/patches, then it'll be in all the autobuilds. :D
yes, feel free to add it :-) > > I have two comments on it: > > - Instead of having an 'entry' for each line, I think there should be > a scrollable text field of fixed size, like 10 elements or so. Then > that textfield can handle unlimited numbers of paths. Then there > would be a + and - button to add and remove things. yes of course. however it was too complicated for my limited knowledge of tcl/tk and time. > > - instead of having pd_startup0 thru pd_startupN as global variables, > it seems like it would be much cleaner if pd_startup (and pd_path for > that matter) were array or list references. again my limited skills! btw, "pd_startup" and "pd_path" _are_ list references. i just didn't bother how to add elements of a global list variable as storage for the text entries. the good thing is that with my patch, at least the infrastructure at the C-side is independent of the number of paths. just take my code and modify it to your needs. fgma.r IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
