On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 06:51 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > you forgot the attachment.
i am just a stupid tired whatsoever... i had a look at it and it is actually quite interesting. it doesn't give at all the same values that [metro] would give, as i stated in the previous mail. for easier testing i removed the counter part and had only: [bang~] | [t b b] | | [timer] when changing the blocksize, the output of [timer] doesn't always reflect that. the outputs stick to certain values: 1.3333 2.6666 5.3333 10.6666 21.333 etc it switches, when changing blocksize from 64 to 65, resp. 128->129, 256->257 etc. i think, this is probably not funny behaviour of [metro], but of [bang~]. perhaps it doesn't output messages with the kind of timestamps (or whatever this mechanism should be called) as [metro] does ? roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list