On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:34 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:43 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >>> >>> .pd_darwin is still supported for legacy externals. >>> >> Pd-extended only builds objects using .pd_darwin as an extension. >> It works fine for i386, PowerPC, and universal binaries. > > but then, pd-extended _is_ a legacy project (no harm intended from > my side; there is nothing wrong with that) > > once Pd-extended grows to 0.41, chances are high that it will > support the .d_fat idiom too. > in the meantime, we can argue whether it was a good idea to have > different suffixes for different OS's _and_ architectures (but why > should we?)
Actually, Pd-extended will stick to .pd_darwin as the default unless someone else really wants to change it. .d_fat was introducted in 0.40, and the current Pd-extended still uses .pd_darwin. .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Access to computers should be unlimited and total. - the hacker ethic _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
