Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Now that I think about it, it would also work to have each call open > an instance of a patch within one constantly running Pd process. > Then when the call is dropped, that patch instance would close. For > this to work well, we'd need to add the ability for a patch to close > itself programmatically (currently, when a patch sends menuclose to > itself, Pd crashes :( )
Yes, that would certainly be the ideal way to do it. In fact, instead of messing around with multiple Pd processes, I would much rather just help solve whatever the problem is that causes this not to work. Are there any existing bug reports or any previous discussions about the problem? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
