Hrm. Thats pretty interesting - and I honestly would not have suspected this to be the case - in my tests on OS X, mjpeg has consistently been the winner. My understanding reflects romans earlier posts to a t.
Can you put/host the videos anywhere? How were you compressing the Quicktime files and the XVIDs? On Dec 8, 2007, at 7:16 PM, patrick wrote: > after testing many codec on linux, XVID is the best codec for filesize > and cpu. both. playing a dv, jpeg quicktime or mjpeg avi are +- 35% of > my cpu (640x480 / 30 fps). XVID will take only 7% of my cpu and the > filesize is reduced by half. by forcing keyframe every frame i can (in > theory) use it like jpeg, mjpep (skip, scratch etc...). _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
