Hi, actually wrap~ seems really buggy. Maybe its the nature of its concept, anyway my fix is to wrap wrap~ into [wrap-switch~] that has a sig~ connected to the wrap~ inlet and then a [r wrapswitch]. Now you can change the wrapping on all wrap~´s just by sending 0,1 or even 2 to [r wrapswitch].
Maybe I´m just beeing neurotic but there is some kind of very incosistent bug, maybe some kind of overflow. I´ll try once more to track it. mvh/"the other" Steffen (Leve Poulsen) on XP Pd version 0.40-2 Frank Barknecht skrev: > Hallo, > Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > >>>> Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway? >>> Theoretically yes, but practically it seems that adding the second >>> wrap~ after wrap~ is exactly what fixes the problem! >> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-05/049886.html >> >> Hope this helps... > > Ah, it's that one. Okay, I'll add one then. > > Ciao _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
