On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 18:10 -0600, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
> Furthermore, if this loop is eating up CPU and making the system unresponsive,
> you can make the situation much better by adding a simple sleep that makes the
> process yield to to other waiting processes on each iteration of the loop.
> The
> new version would look like:
>
> static void until_bang(t_until *x)
> {
> x->x_run = 1;
> x->x_count = -1;
> while (x->x_run && x->x_count) {
> x->x_count--;
> outlet_bang(x->x_obj.ob_outlet);
> usleep(1);
> }
> }
I think this is the best idea. But after writing my last post to the
list, I started to wonder if Miller had a good reason for not doing this
when he wrote the original code?
Jamie
--
www.postlude.co.uk
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
