On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in practice i found it often simpler to write tests that only output a
result when they know that they have passed: you need to create far less
logic, which might minimize the chance to write buggy tests (which i
found is inevitable) likewise, it is often simple to have a shortcut to
tell the framework that the test is known to have failed (most of these
shortcuts could be avoided by splitting the test into several sub-tests;
in practice i found that i prefer to write less tests) apart from that,
a mechanism to quit a test from outside after some timeout might be a
good idea.
But this is not really what we were talking about. We were thinking about
the WAIT state. I sort of assumed that there were both PASS and FAIL
results, and this is why I said tri-state, but we were talking about how
to represent WAIT in Pd.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
