Hi Frank, I studied your patch and I substituted the [delay] with [pipe], but, honestly, I wasn't able to find anything wrong there! I also checked by comparing one of the delay-based metros and a proper [metro] of the same speed with timer and they run at the same speed. (see my attached patch). Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Libero
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:49:10 +0100
From: Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PD] complex metronomes sequencing problem (Frank
Barknecht)
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Maybe you can just make one of the delay-sequencers your master metro,
> and encode the periods of the other delays as difference values to
> the period of the master.
>
> Example: You have one master metro at 100. Then you want one
> metro/delay A run at 101, another one, B, at 102. For the first bang,
> delay A will come 1msec late, so its delay will be 1msec. The next
> time, A bangs, it will come 2 msec late, and so on, so A will be n
> times 1msec late, modulo 101. For metro/delay B this will be (n*2msec) %
> 102.
>
> Attached is an example for this re-encoding in action. You can use the
> master position number box in the to left to jump to a certain
> position. (This is not really a IOI approach anymore, though.)
Ah, sorry. The math and attachement are wrong here, as the metro will
interrupt the scheduled bangs in the delays everytime it bangs. I don't
have time for a fix ATM, but maybe you find one on your own. ;)
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
delaychanger-barknecht-27-12-07-libero-03.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
