I generally use what I think the reader would be most interested in. If there is something in the icmc96.ps paper that is related, I would include that, otherwise, I use a misc entry with the http:// puredata.info URL.
.hc On Jan 24, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Andy Farnell wrote: > > Use the @MISC bibtex entry > author: Puckette et al > date: 1996 > > or you may prefer to cite this as a pointer > > http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Publications/icmc96.ps > > See for constructing MISC bibtex fields > > http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~jacobsd/bib/formats/bibtex.html > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:43:43 -0800 > "B. Bogart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> Is there a specific way to cite Pure-Data in an academic paper? R >> outputs a bibtex entry when you call cite(). Is there some >> standard for PD? >> >> OT: How is software generally cited? >> >> Thanks, >> .b. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >> listinfo/pd-list > > > -- > Use the source > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice, it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
