Send PD-list mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of PD-list digest..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today's Topics:
1. Re: How to cite PD in an academic paper? (Hans-Christoph Steiner)
2. Re: visca camera control in pd? (B. Bogart)
3. Re: Mac OS X Intel autobuilds (brandon zeeb)
4. paranoid pd (naysayer)
5. Re: paranoid pd (Derek Holzer)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [PD] How to cite PD in an academic paper?
From:
Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:08:33 -0500
To:
Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
[email protected]
I generally use what I think the reader would be most interested in.
If there is something in the icmc96.ps paper that is related, I would
include that, otherwise, I use a misc entry with the
http://puredata.info URL.
.hc
On Jan 24, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
Use the @MISC bibtex entry
author: Puckette et al
date: 1996
or you may prefer to cite this as a pointer
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Publications/icmc96.ps
See for constructing MISC bibtex fields
http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~jacobsd/bib/formats/bibtex.html
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:43:43 -0800
"B. Bogart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
Is there a specific way to cite Pure-Data in an academic paper? R
outputs a bibtex entry when you call cite(). Is there some standard
for PD?
OT: How is software generally cited?
Thanks,
.b.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Use the source
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more
direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice,
it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [PD] visca camera control in pd?
From:
"B. Bogart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:07:20 -0800
To:
chris clepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
chris clepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
[email protected], Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The elmo just says "Ack, ERR or Complete" but since multiple cameras can
be diasychained then it gets more complex, which camera threw which error.
Another thing to look into is the pan/tilt heads, I was looking at these
as they are much more flexible, you can put any camera on em, but I did
not look very far. (zoom is obviously trouble)
have fun!
.b.
chris clepper wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:00 PM, Martin Peach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
<http://bssc.sel.sony.com/BroadcastandBusiness/docs/manuals/evihd1_tm.pdf>I've
worked with a VISCA cam a few years ago. It just uses 9600 baud RS232
serial, so [comport] can handle it. The harder part is parsing incoming
messages.
Good to know it is possible. What incoming messages need to be
handled? I was thinking that Pd would just send messages to move the
cam around and not really need to know if the they are successful or not.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [PD] Mac OS X Intel autobuilds
From:
brandon zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:05:36 -0500
To:
Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
pd-list list <[email protected]>
Awesome, thanks for the info. I'll take a look at it this weekend.
Should I forward any subsequent issues on this topic (ie: Pd on 10.5
and universal binaries) to the pd-dev list, or this one?
I'll let you all know when I have the builds going.
Cheers,
~Brandon
On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Cool. It's not too hard to setup, here's how. First use rsync to
get the code:
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/GettingPdSource
Then install all the dependencies:
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/darwin
Then add the script to a cron job so it runs automatically:
pure-data/scripts/auto-build/pd-extended-auto-builder.sh
Universal builds for Pd-extended won't work, but it wouldn't be too
hard to get working, and very much a worthwhile project.
.hc
On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:11 PM, bsoisoi wrote:
I have a 1.5ghz powerbook G4 with 2gb of RAM that is acting as a
server for me right now. It is running 10.5.1, and I'm pretty sure
powerpc macs can build Universal Binary / Intel binaries.
If someone can figure that out (or help me figure it out) I can
donate dedicated CPU time on this machine for nightly Pd-extended
PPC/Intel autobuilds.
Let me know,
~Brandon
On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:31 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I don't think anyone has done a 10.5 build or a universal build yet.
If someone wants to tackle that, then we can just have universal
builds every night on whatever machine AFAIK.
.hc
On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:28 PM, vade wrote:
What machine is it hans/marius? Perhaps we can set aside an intel box
for um, us researchers and we can leave it on :) Since I am probably
around more than Hans is I can check on it periodically.
I believe PPC systems can compile intel builds, with 10.5, no (im not
positive but I think you can target them??)? If so, we may have a
spare machine for this at Poly we can put in the research area
that no
one will mess with...
On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:20 PM, marius schebella wrote:
jan 17 has one.
the reason why the machine is down isvery trivial. the autobuild
process
was set up on a school machine which is in daily use by students and
good students turn off the machine during night. Afaik the machines
got
totally reset for the beginning of the new semester (starting with
jan22). don't know if it will be up again. hans?
marius.
bsoisoi wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is there a reason there hasn't been an autobuild for Mac OS X x86
since around 2007-12-07? Do we know when we can expect the Intel
builds to resume?
Thanks,
~Brandon
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into
the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess
himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
kill your television
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
[PD] paranoid pd
From:
naysayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:42:58 +1100
To:
"Pd-List (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
To:
"Pd-List (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
saved the patch or not.
i hope i'm not being intolerant.
thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: [PD] paranoid pd
From:
Derek Holzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:00:44 +0100
To:
naysayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
naysayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC:
"Pd-List \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
CTL + W is very close to CTL + E, so I for one am glad it's there.
d.
naysayer wrote:
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
saved the patch or not.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PD-list mailing list
[email protected]
to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
