Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> >> but i really don't know >> >> mfga.sd >> IOhannes > > Dynamically linked libraries also trigger the GPL. For example, most
yeah; i wanted to stress that shipping a patch with abstraction dependencies could even be considered as static linking - because people seem to think that static linking enforces the GPL more than dynamic linking. (which does say nothing about whether this is true) > Linux kernel modules are dynamically linked into the kernel these > days, and they definitely required to be GPL. but there _are_ non-GPL'ed kernel-modules. even though they are disliked. mfg.,asdr. IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
