matteo sisti sette wrote: > > Testing with 0.40.1 on Windows XP. hi. i remember the same (or very similar) behaviour a few years ago (on linux). my base patch was very similar (random oscillators, but also controlled oscillators) so it did not bother me too much (as i had several 100 to 1000 of them; 1 missing would not make a big difference) i have not investigated why it is like this. probably time to do it.
mfga.sdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
