Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hi Claude and list, > > I'm thinking if a custom file extension for pdlua classes would make > sense? Currently pdlua loads all *.lua files, which complicates > working with *.lua modules not intended to be used as pd classes: > Those would have to be in a directory outside of Pd's search path to > not pollute Pd's namespace.
Ah, true. > So my suggestion would be to use something like *.pd_lua, *.pdlua or > *.l_lua as extension. What do you think? The same question may become > an issue for other loaders as well, so a standard solution would be > nice. Ok, expect this change in the next release (sometime in March). I'm leaning towards *.pd_lua personally, to match *.pd_linux and *.pd_darwin, but if anyone has strong objections let me know. Claude -- http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list