Hi, On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 14:03 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> I'm thinking if a custom file extension for pdlua classes would make > sense? Currently pdlua loads all *.lua files, which complicates > working with *.lua modules not intended to be used as pd classes: > Those would have to be in a directory outside of Pd's search path to > not pollute Pd's namespace. > > So my suggestion would be to use something like *.pd_lua, *.pdlua or > *.l_lua as extension. What do you think? The same question may become > an issue for other loaders as well, so a standard solution would be > nice. How about *.pd.lua? This has the advantage keeping the standard .lua extension whilst providing a standardised suffix which indicates that this is a special Pd Lua script... Just a thought. Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
