Frank,
> The theory for this technique is here: > http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node187.html > (snip) > Basically the whole construct below each [wrap~] is just the equation > from there in Pd patch format. Thanks Frank, the whole thing makes since now. > Not really: Numbers directly connected to [phasor~]'s first inlet get > converted to a constant signal inside of [phasor~] automatically now. > IIRC this wasn't the case for older versions of Pd, and then you had > to use a [sig~] in between to do the conversion from message to > signal. Studying *nix in parallel with Pd, I am almost about to build a habit of assuming that anything looking obscure at first sight is there simply for "historical reasons" :) Thanks again. -- David Shimamoto _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
