On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Thomas Grill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am 16.03.2008 um 20:24 schrieb Phil Stone: > > > Sorry, I think I deleted the included patch from Luke's original > > post when I replied to it. > > > > Thanks for the hint, i was able to retrieve Luke's original patch. > However, i can't find any problems with pool. > Storing and retrieving mentioned values works flawlessly with the > current version. > > gr~~~ >
Hi Thomas, I couldn't try the beta version of pool you posted on grrrr.org since Pd complains about "unknown filetype", I assume because they are Universal builds and my Pd is only Intel? Anyway, the version of pool I was using when this occurred was definitely compiled (by me) after you fixed the large-data issue, but I will compile again to be sure and let you know (actually, I think I tested it with a PPC-compiled version too). Sorry I didn't pare down the repro-patch anymore, every time I did the bug would disappear : ). Finally, Phil I would not be worried; this seems/seemed to only occur with numerical keys, and I use pool many many times a day in the context of Memento to save and load tons of stuff without issue : ). Cheers Luke _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
