On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 15:08 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Mar 18, 2008, at 4:30 AM, Georg Holzmann wrote: > > > Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb: > >> I think they want to see more polish on the app. I had a brief > >> conversation with the administrator of GSoC, Leslie Hawthorn: > > > > Hm, I don't know ... > > We had really many ideas on the page and described in many details > > (at least the most of them) - much more than last year. > > Also the other organizations I was looking through did have much > > less ideas without a detailed description ... > > > > However, of course it can be better for the next time ;) > > > I think they wanted to see the whole page look polished. We had a > lot of ideas, some polished, and some just jotted down.
Well at least the list is there now. Pity about the application, I was looking forward to it :-( Anyhow - had I known about the ideas needing more fleshing out I would have been happy to do so. Here's to next year's app with more flesh on the bones! BTW, I also wonder if we would have a better chance if we had some kind of already established 'Foundation' - I see this word popping up a lot on the participating organisations page. I know Pd enjoys its de-centralised status, but having some kind of semi-formal 'Foundation' seems to help with things like funding applications. What do you think? Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
