On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > 2: don't use the full Pd-extended but strip it down to your needs (i > > personally use a barebone Pd and add 3 or so libraries - i still have an > > overview about what is loaded...) > > I'm sometimes thinking about making a pd-condensed fork of pd-extended > which includes only externals and abstractions without nameclashes. ;)
Same here! It would be good to have a distribution with a maintainer who is slightly less conservative than Miller about what goes in, but still keep it really tight. Maybe it would also be cool to see a "democratized" version of Pd where externals and libraries must be first nominated and then voted in by some requisite number of positive votes. For this to work I think we'd need to have people for each major GNU/Linux distribution who would do the work of the actual packaging and submission, separate to the building (My aims are totally selfish - I'd love to be able to apt-get install this). Even more talking with no action (sorry Roman), Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
