Frank Barknecht wrote: > > I think it's at least a bit annoying that Gem sets a hardcoded > help-path prefix to "Gem" and doesn't use the objnam-help.pd pattern.
afair, this has been removed from Gem. > > I would much prefer it if Gem would behave like almost every other > external/abstraction collection as this wouldn't require the special > handling of Gem help files anymore. Currently some files in extra/Gem > are abstractions (which have their "*-help.pd" files) other files are > real help files for binary objects, but don't have a -help.pd suffix > and it's all a bit, well, confusing, to say the least. Oki, I'm used > to it over the years, but for a newcomer it surely is hard to follow. afaik, your confusing setup is due to leftovers from old installations. a fresh "make install" of Gem should do: - create extra/Gem/ - put Gem.pd_linux into extra/Gem/ - put all help-files (with "-help" suffix) into extra/Gem/ - put all abstractions into extra/Gem/ - put all help-files for abstractions (absname with "-help" suffix) into extra/Gem/ - put the examples/ folder into doc/gem/ if it doesn't do so, please file a bug-report. one could argue that the examples/ should go into extra/Gem/examples/ mfga.sd IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list