Yep. What is to be done about that? Should we keep to the conventions of vanilla and Pd generally by changing that?
I am torn on this. I would have a lot of rewriting to do but would like to see conventions observed. OTOH, maybe compatibility with patches out there using Cyclone [pow~] should be respected as a priority. BTW it's very important for to know. If it changes after I publish the book I will hire a bounty hunter to bring me the fingers of whoever made the changes :) On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:39:07 -0400 marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > btw, are all pow~ objects reversed? right inlet^left inlet? > marius. > > Andy Farnell wrote: > > Did I read that Cyclone is to be incorporated into vanilla Pd? > > > > Having discovered too late that [pow~] is not part of vanilla > > I am about to remove the constraint of using vanilla Pd for > > the synthetic sound design book since it is incomplete without > > basic mathematical operators. > > > > andy > > > -- Use the source _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list