Hi Claude, sorry that it took so long to test and to answer to your suggestion.
I tried it with [readsf~] and [tabwrite~] plus [switch~ 64 1 32] and it works perfectly. It's about 40% of the speed (upsampling 32x)compared to[soundfiler] and has absolutely no dropouts or any other artifacts (so far). The only annoying thing is that it may take forever setting all the table sizes (around 3000 samples) manually. I tried [wavinfo] but it didn't really work. It may be better anyway not to change anything about the tablesizes while loading in background. However it will spped up loading time from currently 1 minute 45 sec to about 30-40 seconds. That's absolutely great. Thanks for the hint! Ingo > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Claude Heiland-Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 13:14 > An: Ingo Scherzinger > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [PD] soundfiler alternative - realtime? (loading in > background) > > Ingo Scherzinger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > does anybody know if there is an alternative method to soundfiler in > > order to load wave files into tables. > > [readsf~] and [tabwrite~] in an upsampled subpatch (with [block~]). > > No -resize support there though, and it's only "N times" faster than > real time, not "as fast as possible without dropouts". > > > Claude > -- > http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
