chris clepper wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Patrice Colet <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi, it's possible to render on a video file the texture drawn into a > geo object, but the quality is always poor whatever codec we use (even > uncompressed files), that can be useful for having poor animated > textures, but anyway the quality is never as good as we can get when we > render into picture files (isn't it?). > > > The contents of the framebuffer are exactly what you see onscreen. I > don't understand what is 'poor' about the image being read back.
you are right, I only want to add two tiny comments: gemframebuffer does not allow changing of view and perspec and it has no FSAA like onscreen. marius. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
