IOhannes,
Thanks for your help. I must have been miss understanding what goes on inside a re-blocked sub-patch. With your notes and patch, now I can go spend the rest of the night refreshing my mindset :) -- David Shimamoto > PSPunch wrote: >> IOhannes, >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> I tried what you have suggested with the only existing object I could >> think of which was [switch~ (N) 1 0.5]. > > well, this will actually do downsampling (sample reduction), whereas you > want upsampling (sample extrapolation): [block~ 128 1 2] > > of course this depends on where (inside a resampled patch or outside a > patch) you put the signal source and where (outside or inside) you want > to access the resampled data. > >> >> Yes, the out put shown on [tabwrite~] is zero-padded but only as long >> as the signal remains inside of the sub patch. > > well ain't this sweet? > > of course the main idea is to work within the resampled domain. > if for whatever reasons you don't want to do so, you have to somehow > "send" the signal from the resampled subpatch to the original patch. > as [send~] will refuse to work, you might want to try other global > memory sharing structures for signal (hint, hint) > > >> >> Can you please tell me if there was a specific procedure you had in mind? >> > > like the attached? (too little time to ascii art) > > fgm,asdr > IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
