On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:53 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > > > the actual behaviour shouldn't be changed. afaik, it is not possible to > > shadow classes of pd or from binary libraries. changing actual behaviour > > would lead to many incosistencies, where sometimes an local abstraction > > would shadow library classes and sometimes not. internal classes > > couldn't be shadowed anyway. it would make the pd-world definitely more > > troublesome. unless it is possible to shadow EVERYTHING (classes from > > binary libraries and internals), this shouldn't be changed, IMO. > > Btw.: Miller is working on making shadowing even builtins possible. > Check pd-dev, unless you've already seen it.
oh, thanks. i usually read pd-dev, but obviously i missed the point here. hans: it seems you're coming up with this at the right time, so forget my concerns ;-) sorry for the noise. roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list