Thanks for the help. [gemhead] | [pix_film] |\ | \ | [pix_separator] | | | [pix_texture] | | | [pix_invert] (to differentiate the streams) | | | [pix_write] | [pix_separator] | [pix_texture] | [rectangle 2 1.5]
here, still i get the image from [rectangle] / gemwin in the recordings from [pix_write]. Is that right? On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:50 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin . wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> [separator] and [pix_separator] still shows both of the films in the >> gemwin, on top of each other. is there a way of not showing one of the >> streams, but still be able to record from it with ex [pix_write]? >> >> a dirty solution would also be to make sure that the stream im >> recording is hidden behind the other layer in gemwin. how is this >> determined, which layer is on top? > > ? > > well, you don't have to display your image. > > [gemhead] > | > [translateXYZ] > | > [rotateXYZ] > | > [pix_film] > | > [pix_texture] > | > > will do a lot of work without displaying anything (as no [rectangle] gets > drawn anywhere in the gemchain); nevertheless all the pixel-data (and > openGL-stuff) is really executed, so it is available for whatever you want, > e.g. [pix_record] or [pix_write] > > > fgmasdr > IOhannes > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
