Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote: > All of that said, I think something like the [sampler~] object > proposed in another post would be much in keeping with the > "user-friendly" filter objects like [bp~] (as opposed to [rpole~] and > [rzero~] which are the real "building block" kinds of filter classes). > An object name like [sampler~] would indeed restrict its relevance to > sampling, and the automatic interpolation schemes would support this > restriction... such a thing might be useful in readsf~ contexts as > well.
Though I would rather avoid the terms "sampler" or "sampling", as "sample" already has so many different meanings in the audio world, it almost lost all usefulness. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
