Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > bsoisoi wrote: > >I agree, being able to specify interpolation via an inlet message would > >be great (from my users perspective). > > hmm, i am not totally convinced (but actually don't care)
Is anyone else besides me reminded of a "color of bike shed" discussion? > as this leads to bloated objects which can just do everything and > you specify what they should do via parameters. why do we have > objects then? However in this case I think, it does make sense to keep it in a single object and set interpolation through messages: all suggested tabread4~ variants do a table read using 4 table points for interpolation, so all of them could be named tabread4~. They only differ in the actual formula in use. Variants of 4-point interpolation may also be useful in other objects like vd~ and tabosc4~. Here the same message interface could be used again, which is good for mnemonics. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
