You can see the attached patch if you want linear interpolation and can stand a little delay. More intricate interpolations (any of the cubic ones posted in the [tabread4~] thread, e.g.) can be done in this way at the expense of more processing and longer delay.
Matt > Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:10:46 +0200 > From: Atte Andr? Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PD] raw resampling > To: Claude Heiland-Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: pure data <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > >> in~ [phasor~ 4410] >> | | >> [samphold~] >> | >> out~ > > Ah, of course! > >> Note: this doesn't change the sample rate, but resamples the signal at >> 4410Hz. Not sure if this is what you want, but it's what I use if I want >> lots of aliasing... > > I didn't really expect to have a signal at 4410. Would that have any > benefits, for instance with regards to performance? > > Basically I (like you) just want to hear some alias noise! > > -- > peace, love & harmony > Atte > > http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen > http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk
samphold_lin~.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
