D'oh! Re-replying with the right subject. =o(
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Matt Barber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can see the attached patch if you want linear interpolation and > can stand a little delay. More intricate interpolations (any of the > cubic ones posted in the [tabread4~] thread, e.g.) can be done in this > way at the expense of more processing and longer delay. > > > Matt > > >> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:10:46 +0200 >> From: Atte Andr? Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [PD] raw resampling >> To: Claude Heiland-Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: pure data <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: >> >>> in~ [phasor~ 4410] >>> | | >>> [samphold~] >>> | >>> out~ >> >> Ah, of course! >> >>> Note: this doesn't change the sample rate, but resamples the signal at >>> 4410Hz. Not sure if this is what you want, but it's what I use if I want >>> lots of aliasing... >> >> I didn't really expect to have a signal at 4410. Would that have any >> benefits, for instance with regards to performance? >> >> Basically I (like you) just want to hear some alias noise! >> >> -- >> peace, love & harmony >> Atte >> >> http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen >> http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk >
samphold_lin~.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
