On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Chris McCormick wrote:
Compared to the "deleting least important columns" technique that they
show at 1:40, the Seam Carving technique sweeps the distorsions under
the carpet. After that, don't wonder what the big lump under the carpet
is.
Yes, that is the exact point of seam carving. I'm not sure why you're
putting a negative lumps-under-the-carpet slant on the idea.
Well, it's only negative if someone is going to be using this as if it
were for _scaling_ the picture. If from the start it's clear that this is
going to be an effect that is quite special, it's alright. I wouldn't like
to have this to resize images in a web browser, for example.
When applying the technique to the spectrogram of a song, you should hear
it many times more than you'd see it.
I take it this is speculation. I am interested to know if anyone has
tried it and listened to the results.
No, I haven't listened to it. So I suppose that what I say doesn't count.
Isn't part of what makes a note perceptible it's higher energy compared
to the surrounding space in the spectrogram?
Yes, but it all depends on how you define "energy" for the occasion.
Throughout the video, the concept of energy is redefined (e.g.: to edit
people out), but even their original definition is somewhat
special-purpose, just like it usually is in image processing... I mean
that there is no standard definition for it in image processing.
Maybe I sould just do it.
You should do it because you will not hear about anyone that has actually
tried it, and you want to know what it is really like, not what I think it
will do. I still recommend that you do it on an actual score instead of
(or in addition to) a spectrogram.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
