Hi,
I've never noticed send/receive causing unpredictable execution order. Can someone show me an example of under what circumstances this occurs so I can avoid future head aches? -- David Shimamoto > Atte André Jensen wrote: >> Frank Barknecht wrote: >> >>> Yes, it is. ;) >> But slightly more tricky is that send/recieve must have the same >> "problems", but may be more difficult to spot. >> > > indeed, this problem exists. > > that is why you should use explicit connections and [trigger] whenever > possible. > > on the other hand, i do have plans for a [receive] where you could > enforce a certain order (similar to [gemhead]) > > > and since we are there: never use [delay] to enforce a certain execution > order (it does work, but usually you will get weird (though totally > deterministic) results in more complex setups) > > fmgasd.r > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
