On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 02:00 -0700, Julian Villegas wrote: > I did, > in fact I'm using sigmund~ cause somewhere in this list, someone > (Miller?) said it was better to use it instead of fiddle~. Can anybody > confirm that sigmund~ is better?
What do you mean 'better'? What is it you are trying to do? > I have a patch that relies on realtime pitch and partials extraction, > and I'd like to compare different objects but I have only found > sigmund~. Sigmund~ reports peaks by analyzing the FFT of a window, I'd > like to compare other methods (stft?, wavelets?, ...?) > > Any other ideas? You might want to take a look at the xtract_peak_spectrum() function provided in LibXtract. http://www.postlude.co.uk/Software/Libxtract There are Pd bindings provided, and an example of how to use [xtract~ peak_spectrum] is shown in the help file: [f0] -> [pd guts] -> [pd pda]. Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiebullock _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
