Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Jul 17, 2008, at 4:34 AM, hard off wrote: > >> ok, sorry to have caused a fuss. >> >> last question: hypothetically, if miller was to include >~ and <~ >> into vanilla, would they load properly then? > >> i think those objects SHOULD be a part of vanilla pd anyway. in any >> sort of audio synthesis patch i do, they invariably need to be used. > > > Depends on how they are built and loaded.
i guess that hard off was thinking of the way internals are currently included into Pd (compiled statically into a multi-object "library" that get's automatically loaded at startup) when he was asking to "include" them into vanilla, rather than include them like "expr" (as an external that ships with the vanilla distribution) fgamsdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
