On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:40 AM, marius schebella wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> As a test yes, but not for the release. It's changing too fast >> right now to maintain backwards compatibility, so including it >> would cause more problems than it would solve. > > I am not sure, if it really changes, or if it only adds new > features. I think the big problems (file naming, loader) are > solved, but not sure. > I worked a lot with py/pyext and pdj in the past (which are also > candidates for pdx), but pdlua is the only scripting tool that can > easily integrate the language as a static library, because it is so > small. maintainance should be easier than with python and java.
Adding features is also changing. >> I just had a thought: how about replacing Tcl/Tk with Lua/Tk? >> Just a thought... > > is this just a matter of replacing one with the other, or does this > mean every graphical part has to be rewritten? > > marius. It would mean rewriting pd.tk in Lua and translating the Tcl/Tk code in the C files into Lua/Tk. .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
