Hallo, Atte André Jensen hat gesagt: // Atte André Jensen wrote: > Both seems complex, and although I appreciate RRADical's (which it seems > memento is part of) "paradigm", I'm still quite new to PD and would like > to make a few mistakes and learn a few lessons before I "just" adopt > someone else's approach.
Then I would recommend [sssad]. It's the most simple of them all and doesn't need any externals. (Note that it's missing from pd-extended's autobuilds currently for reasons I don't understand.) What I prefer about [sssad] over "memento" is that it's backend agnostic. Memento for example is very much tied to [pool], while with [sssad] you can (and have to) implement your own storage. You can use [textfile], message boxes, [pool] or anything that can receive and send messages. [sssad] just is a listening to what goes on in a patch but doesn't touch the harddisk itself. Oh, and forget about [state], it's only for number boxes and a state of a patch is so much more than what's shown in number boxes, that it's not worth bothering with [state] (unless you want to save number box contents) Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
