Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Jul 29, 2008, at 1:31 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > >> Hallo, >> Luke Iannini hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini wrote: >> >>> There are some amazing sets of abstractions being released recently, >>> which has served to highlight the many extant styles of patching. I >>> was wondering if there was interest in establishing a set of >>> guidelines for patching in the vein of PEP 8 for Python; I've found >>> that document to be very relaxing as it is a standardized approach to >>> OCD. More seriously, it greatly helps when reading other people's >>> code or collaborating. >>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ >> I think, it would be important to first collect every possible style >> element in the wild and document what people are using in reality. >> That would be interesting. I'm not too much in favour of a style >> "guide" >> however. Let people be creative. > > Nobody is talking about requirements. If you don't like style > guides, don't use them. But it is really not useful to squelch other > people's efforts, especially when you don't even have an intention of > using this stuff.
I actually liked frank's idea to collect different people's ideas and compare them. maybe there is some common sense in all of them? marius. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
