Atte André Jensen wrote: > Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > >> Should be in the help patch for throw~, otherwise file a bug report. > > Thanks everyone for the input, I've got something to work with. I now > realize my question came out all wrong, I'm perfectly aware of the > difference between dac~ and throw~, I was just wondering if there's a > greater logic behind the fact that throw~ accepts set messages? Can > anything general be said about which objects accepts set-messages?
no. which messages an object supports is entirely up to the object itself. even though Pd's code has rudimentary implementation of an object-oriented inheritance concept, this is only used in a few special cases. there are 3 ways to find out which objects accept a "set" message: - read the help-patch - read the source - send a "set" message to the object and see what it does fgmasdr IOhannes' _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
