Ricardo Dueñas Parada wrote: > > > an object. however, this will get quite tricky as soon as you start to > > remove objects, because then need to keep track, _which_ object you > > removed. > > Yes it is, at certain point, I don´t know which have I erased. > > I found the help patch about creating new abstractions through messages, > and it was really helpful, but I couldn't use [dyn~], I copied it to the > respective > folder, and when I try to create, pd says: > > > dyn~ 0.1.2 - dynamic object management, (C)2003-2006 Thomas Grill > > dyn~ - Syntax: dyn~ sig-ins msg-ins sig-outs msg-outs > dyn~ > ... couldn't create > > any idea?
try to give arguments for inlets and outlets, be precise, whether you want signal in/outs or message in/outs. the syntax is [dyn~ 1 2 3 4] 1) number of signal inlets 2) number of signal inlets 3) number of signal outlets 4) number of signal outlets don't be scared of the syntax, basically you give every object a name/id, and that lets you delete the objects without knowing the order, in which you created them. marius. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
