martin brinkmann wrote: > Si Mills wrote: > > I've been using [expr~ ] as a workaround >> eg. [expr~ $v1<0.5] > > ok, it is good to know that there is a workaround,
actually zexy provides the [>~] objects _additionally_ as abstraction which do exactly this: wrap [expr~] the only problem with this is, that you have to decide beforehand whether you want to have signals or float (messages) on the right-hand input. that's the main reason why zexy also provides [>~] as an external object (that allows both, depending on whether you specify a default argument - just like [+~] and the like) > and i will probably use the expr-method in the future > for compatibility with 'pd vanilla'. but i am not > looking forward to converting all my patches... > thanks for your hint! it's probably always a good idea to try to have a look inside 3rd-party objects; sometimes they really are just abstractions and you can learn a lot... amdsr IOhannes _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list