Quoting Jamie Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 09:54 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote: >> Hi Jamie >> >> It's not much but might be helpful to port other stuff to purepd. >> >> you'll find >> gt~.pd (>~) >> lt~.pd (<~) >> sgn~.pd >> >> http://www.netpd.org/eni/purepd/ > > That's great actually, and I'd love to contribute back into this. > However, if I'm not mistaked aren't there two purepd projects > netpd/purepd and Hans's purepd in pd svn? Would it be worth feeding your > patches into Hans's, and then any other abstractions I make/find I can > also feed into svn? >
just out of curiosity: >~.pd, <~.pd, sgn~ and what else in zexy are already pd-vanilla abstractions (some of them are both abstractions and externals for performance reasons); is there an advantage in collecting these things in yet another arbitrary (as opposed to grouped by functionality) library? fgmasdr IOhannes ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
