Jamie Bullock wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 04:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Quoting hard off <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> jamie, my diy collection has no licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm >>> more than happy for you to do whatever and use it. >>> >> >> each and every piece of software has a licence. >> just because you haven't manually assigned a license, doesn't mean >> that you have chosen the "no licence" option. > <snip> > > That's true, content defaults to 'all rights reserved' by the copyright > holder -- the content author unless a license is supplied explicitly . > However, by emailing me and writing "jamie, my diy collection has no > licence, no need for credit., etc.. i'm more than happy for you to do > whatever and use it." hard off is effectively supplying a license to me > to use the software to do whatever I like.
definitely; i just wanted to make sure that people know that they have to make their wish to share explicit in order to make it all work. it's a system of distrust, but its the system we live in. fgmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
